"Oceania" Vinyl LP - poor mastering causing distortion
#45
Posted 22 June 2012 - 05:38 PM
#48
Posted 22 June 2012 - 08:58 PM
#50
Posted 23 June 2012 - 05:38 AM
I honestly don't mean to be argumentative, but based on your video I hear even more distortion from your record than I do from mine. The vocals are especially fuzzed out. There is obviously some compression from the stream causing distortion as well, but the inner groove distortion is obvious to me. Nice collection by the way.
#51
Posted 23 June 2012 - 06:24 AM
bjorn, on 23 June 2012 - 05:38 AM, said:
I honestly don't mean to be argumentative, but based on your video I hear even more distortion from your record than I do from mine. The vocals are especially fuzzed out. There is obviously some compression from the stream causing distortion as well, but the inner groove distortion is obvious to me. Nice collection by the way.
No to each their own, I hear a bit of fuzz/distorting as well, but when I have it turned up and I'm listening to it, It just doesn't bother me...? If this is worse than yours, then obviously we have a huge difference of opinions. ?.. I'm sure my "test" isn't 100% either. I mean I adjusted the signal up a bit when I recorded it. That could have something to do with it, but I've done that before on other records and it wasn't an issue.
That just goes to show you how different peoples options are.
I have the high quality downloads as well.. I'm listening to them for a comparison. To my old ears, there is just minimal difference, and not enough to make any kind of difference...? I think I've contributed all I can to this endeavor.. I just don't "hear" a big issue..
#52
Posted 23 June 2012 - 07:24 AM
#53
Posted 23 June 2012 - 07:33 AM
#54
Posted 23 June 2012 - 01:50 PM
#55
Posted 23 June 2012 - 02:00 PM
#56
Posted 23 June 2012 - 03:54 PM
Wondering if its even worth buying now. I don't mind spending the $$$ to get a vinyl copy, but i want the sound to be decent on the thing. Wondering if they will do another print of these with the mastering issue sorted. Would be nice to hear a offical word on the issue and if there is any intention of re-printing them.
#57
Posted 25 June 2012 - 08:00 AM
i really do love this album.
d
#58
Posted 26 June 2012 - 11:48 PM
And yes, it is a great album :)/>
#59
Posted 27 June 2012 - 12:00 AM
HypnoRaygun, on 22 June 2012 - 02:40 PM, said:
It's the least you could do...
HypnoRaygun, on 21 June 2012 - 08:16 AM, said:
...Jerk.
#61
Posted 29 June 2012 - 03:11 PM
http://www.amazon.co...s=oceania+vinyl
The vocals sound really fuzzy on a few songs, like others said, and there is a pretty nasty skip that happens in Pale Horse. There is some sort of bump on the record at the end of Pale Horse. I thought it was just my turntable until I googled it and found this thread. I guess I'm not alone. I really wanted to have Oceania on vinyl, but this isn't going to cut it.
#62
Posted 29 June 2012 - 04:27 PM
AMEason52, on 29 June 2012 - 03:11 PM, said:
http://www.amazon.co...s=oceania+vinyl
The vocals sound really fuzzy on a few songs, like others said, and there is a pretty nasty skip that happens in Pale Horse. There is some sort of bump on the record at the end of Pale Horse. I thought it was just my turntable until I googled it and found this thread. I guess I'm not alone. I really wanted to have Oceania on vinyl, but this isn't going to cut it.
Interesting... mine doesn't have the issue with Pale Horse, it plays through that section just fine. Also, this is the first time I've ever seen Amazon stop selling a record like this, they must have received quite a few complaints.
Also, thanks for posting the link HypnoRaygun, it was interesting to see Stan Getz' response to the issue. I agree with him that the cartridge/stylus used to play the record will make a big difference in how it sounds. I still can't understand why he cut the grooves so close to the labels. He didn't do it on the Siamese Dream reissue. Side A of SD is a bit longer than side A of Oceania, yet SD has way more breathing room between the run-out groove and the labels. I just don't get it.
#63
Posted 30 June 2012 - 02:40 PM
#64
Posted 01 July 2012 - 05:34 AM
RottingApples, on 30 June 2012 - 02:40 PM, said:
I use a low output cartridge so that might be why that trick worked for me. Besides spending a few hundred dollars on a better cartridge there's probably nothing else you can do. The warbling sound you mention is odd, I don't think I've run in to that.
#65
Posted 01 July 2012 - 07:24 AM
#66
Posted 01 July 2012 - 07:35 AM
AMEason52, on 01 July 2012 - 07:24 AM, said:
CD artwork pictures here: http://www.smashingp...ndpost&p=697664
#67
Posted 02 July 2012 - 02:25 PM
HypnoRaygun, on 29 June 2012 - 03:49 AM, said:
Interesting article.
I'm not gonna buy top-end equipment to listen to it; especially when there are other listening options available.
Mine will just stay sealed until I inevitably sell all my SP shit.
#68
Posted 05 July 2012 - 06:18 AM
#69
Posted 16 July 2012 - 05:25 PM
I did notice that Violet is cut REAL close to the label. I think this should have either been a 3 LP set OR should have been resequenced for the album if THIS is the reason why it sounds like that - i know that quieter songs are put closer to the centre because of how much smaller the groove gets there.
On Side B now and i hear a slight static on the S sounds for My Love is Winter...
side B is ridden with static/distortion
#70
Posted 16 July 2012 - 05:33 PM
hotoriousDICK, on 16 July 2012 - 05:25 PM, said:
I did notice that Violet is cut REAL close to the label. I think this should have either been a 3 LP set OR should have been resequenced for the album if THIS is the reason why it sounds like that - i know that quieter songs are put closer to the centre because of how much smaller the groove gets there.
On Side B now and i hear a slight static on the S sounds for My Love is Winter...
side B is ridden with static/distortion
It sucks, but I still don't understand why. Siamese is the same length, and I've never had a problem with any vinyl copies I've owned. Add to that, the recent takes from fans that the bonus disc to Pisces is shitty overdriven and clipping, makes you wonder just what the fuck is going on here.
#71
Posted 26 July 2012 - 10:35 AM
They have nothing to do with the actual pressing here.
EMI is having the records pressed and I'm not sure where EMI is having them pressed or if they own their own presses.
A&R Records actually tried to get EMI to do the Oceania as a 3 disc release but they thought that 2 would be just fine.
Billy approved the test pressings and let me tell ya, Billy is a record freak and he listens to the test pressings like a madman.
It is possible for a record to sound good on one record versus another record. Plates for a record to be pressed is only good for about
1000 copies and if the pressing plant lets them go much more past 1000, they can start deteriorating and then you have a record that sounds
like crap no matter how the record was mastered..
#73
Posted 26 July 2012 - 11:10 AM
16RPM, on 26 July 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:
They have nothing to do with the actual pressing here.
EMI is having the records pressed and I'm not sure where EMI is having them pressed or if they own their own presses.
A&R Records actually tried to get EMI to do the Oceania as a 3 disc release but they thought that 2 would be just fine.
Billy approved the test pressings and let me tell ya, Billy is a record freak and he listens to the test pressings like a madman.
It is possible for a record to sound good on one record versus another record. Plates for a record to be pressed is only good for about
1000 copies and if the pressing plant lets them go much more past 1000, they can start deteriorating and then you have a record that sounds
like crap no matter how the record was mastered..
This seems to slightly contradict the SPFreaks interview with Stan Getz. That says A&R did the manufacture (which could be an error), but Getz clearly states he did the vinyl master. Does that mean he created a master and sent it elsewhere to be mass-pressed? I'm a little confused now.
#74
Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:45 PM
adamdanger!, on 26 July 2012 - 11:10 AM, said:
That is correct. He only cuts the music to the lacquers and then those lacquers are sent off to the place that creates
the stampers. From there, the stampers are sent off to the place that will actually press the record.
Test pressings are pressed and Billy himself approves these, Believe me, Billy approved these.
Test pressings are going to sound great because they are at the very front of the pressing and they are the first 5 to 8 copies pressed from those particular plates. If a plant ever goes beyond say 1200 records pressed on one set of stampers, it’s then doing a huge disservice to the record buying public.
#75
Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:52 PM
16RPM, on 26 July 2012 - 01:45 PM, said:
the stampers. From there, the stampers are sent off to the place that will actually press the record.
Test pressings are pressed and Billy himself approves these, Believe me, Billy approved these.
Test pressings are going to sound great because they are at the very front of the pressing and they are the first 5 to 8 copies pressed from those particular plates. If a plant ever goes beyond say 1200 records pressed on one set of stampers, it’s then doing a huge disservice to the record buying public.
Thanks for clarifying. Man, I hate to bitch and whine (see the Pisces thread for my ranting) but my Oceania copy sounds awful. It's definitely not my setup either, as much as the blame wants to be shifted/pointed at that. I have vinyl from the 70's to now and I don't have issues with any other albums like this.
#76
Posted 29 July 2012 - 01:20 PM
a) not many people bought the vinyl
b) people bought the vinyl but only a few are getting these issues which proves the over pressing from the plates theory
c) it's across all vinyls and only a few care to comment on the issues.
#77
Posted 29 July 2012 - 01:49 PM
#78
Posted 30 July 2012 - 04:22 AM
hotoriousDICK, on 29 July 2012 - 01:20 PM, said:
a) not many people bought the vinyl
b) people bought the vinyl but only a few are getting these issues which proves the over pressing from the plates theory
c) it's across all vinyls and only a few care to comment on the issues.
d) it's widespread and people either haven't taken the time to actually listen to their vinyl yet or don't notice the issue. Let's face it, the world is getting used to listening to music of compromised quality.
#79
Posted 30 July 2012 - 05:13 AM
**edit** I tend to agree that most of these were probably pressed WELL past 1000 copies on one set of plates. I work in manufacturing industry (not music...Printing), and see this kind of cost cutting often in other areas.
#82
Posted 03 August 2012 - 06:14 AM
#83
Posted 03 August 2012 - 09:41 AM
#84
Posted 10 August 2012 - 11:31 AM
has it even been confirmed that they did a repress? i am in canada and i purchased through amazon.
hope it's cool.
d
#85
Posted 10 August 2012 - 11:59 AM
what a stupid thing.
oh well.
d
#86
Posted 05 September 2012 - 05:37 PM
Is there a way to tell if we have a"good " copy or a "bad" copy based on serial numbers or something?
#87
Posted 08 September 2012 - 04:37 PM
#88
Posted 10 September 2012 - 07:39 AM
I will say though that Quasar still sounds EPIC

Help




















