worries about the new lyrics
#1
Posted 27 October 2009 - 04:37 AM
am i the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about billy's 'spiritual' crusade???
i am excited about the new album, and the only way i can see myself not liking it is if the lyrics are too preachy...
sure the 'i agree with everything billy says' fanclub will prob have a dig at me but im just curious as to whether anyone else feels the same as me?
#2
Posted 27 October 2009 - 05:35 AM
#3 Guest_XsimonbelmontX_*
Posted 27 October 2009 - 05:42 AM
#5
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:03 AM
Yeah, I'm an atheist, so I can't get on board with all of the spiritual stuff. I'm still ecstatic about Teargarden, I can't wait to hear it, I'm sure I will be blown away, I can overlook a few lyrics I don't agree with if the music is phenomenal, which of course it will be. After all, I don't let Superchrist bother me. I'm sure the lyrics as a whole will be more cryptic than the ones on Zeitgeist, so I really don't think we have anything to worry about.
That is a great attitude to take.
I for one, don't care. I am a religious Christian, so it won't bother me either way. I just want some incredible tunes!
#6
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:21 AM
Billy's faith and spirituality making you uncomfortable is awesome. I love it. And his essays on his blog are very cut and dry and not preachy. I don't think he has ever or would ever demand a fan of his music believe in God or as he describes it as an "intelligence." So, his ideas are very abstract and artistic he isn't putting himself up a pedestal but no matter what he does you people will find something wrong with it.
#7
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:22 AM
#8 Guest_XsimonbelmontX_*
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:30 AM
There are so many biblical references in the Smashing Pumpkins music; you just haven't been paying attention. It is the generation X; believing in God is "lame", Prince is gay, group-think-hive-mind boring attitude that probably kept Billy from openly talking about it. He is also a forty something and not a hip twenty something. Twenty somethings that some how pride themselves on their blind atheism.
Billy's faith and spirituality making you uncomfortable is awesome. I love it. And his essays on his blog are very cut and dry and not preachy. I don't think he has ever or would ever demand a fan of his music believe in God or as he describes it as an "intelligence." So, his ideas are very abstract and artistic he isn't putting himself up a pedestal but no matter what he does you people will find something wrong with it.
I don't think anyone said anything about it making us uncomfortable, just that we happen to not agree with him on those issues. We have been having a peaceful, two-sided discussion here, why do you have to go on the offensive all of a sudden? Blind atheism? Maybe we've thought this through much more than you...consider that. I could have attacked your beliefs, but I chose to be respectful, regardless of whether my views differ...there is no need for your intolerance.
#9
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:39 AM
#10
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:48 AM
Generally, Spiritual Atheists are people who do not believe in a literal "God" (thus the term "Atheist"), but still consider themselves to be (often deeply) "Spiritual" people.
For Spiritual Atheists, being "Spiritual" means (at the very least) to nurture thoughts, words, and actions that are in harmony with the idea that the entire universe is, in some way, connected; even if only by the mysterious flow of cause and effect at every scale.
Therefore, Spiritual Atheists generally feel that as they go about their lives striving to be personally healthy and happy, they should also be striving to help the world around them be healthy and happy. (This empowering concept is referred to as "Wholistic Ethics".)
Spiritual Atheists generally recognize the word "God" as a personal name that has been given to the collective personality* of the infinite and eternal universe; just as your personal name is the name that has been given to your individual personality*. Even so, many Spiritual Atheists are extremely reluctant to make use of the word "God"
This is quoted from the spiritual athiest website. This seems to fall in line with what BC talks about. He doens't care who you worship, just love and be a positive light on the world.
#11 Guest_XsimonbelmontX_*
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:30 AM
It is possible to be an athiest and spiritual at the same time.
Generally, Spiritual Atheists are people who do not believe in a literal "God" (thus the term "Atheist"), but still consider themselves to be (often deeply) "Spiritual" people.
For Spiritual Atheists, being "Spiritual" means (at the very least) to nurture thoughts, words, and actions that are in harmony with the idea that the entire universe is, in some way, connected; even if only by the mysterious flow of cause and effect at every scale.
Therefore, Spiritual Atheists generally feel that as they go about their lives striving to be personally healthy and happy, they should also be striving to help the world around them be healthy and happy. (This empowering concept is referred to as "Wholistic Ethics".)
Spiritual Atheists generally recognize the word "God" as a personal name that has been given to the collective personality* of the infinite and eternal universe; just as your personal name is the name that has been given to your individual personality*. Even so, many Spiritual Atheists are extremely reluctant to make use of the word "God"
This is quoted from the spiritual athiest website. This seems to fall in line with what BC talks about. He doens't care who you worship, just love and be a positive light on the world.
See, things like this I have absolutely no problem with, and I agree, this does seem to be much more in line with Billy's perspective. I don't subscribe to it personally, but it is a beautiful way of thinking, I certainly have the utmost respect for anyone who lives their life in this manner. It just doesn't appeal to me...not that I don't care about other people, but I don't hold the belief that we are all connected by any spiritual force. What one person does can affect a lot of people, even the entire world, and that can be attributed to emotions, or actual physical impact. The spiritual aspect is just another way of looking at it, but it can't be measured or determined by any scientific means. Still, I have absolutely no issue with this, and if Billy's new lyrics are all centered around this idea, I think it is fantastic, I am completely open to it, if nothing else, it will be intriguing subject matter.
The only thing I have a problem with at all is crazy religious people who are full of hate for anyone and anything that doesn't fit their specific taste (i.e. homosexuals, people of another race or culture, abortion, anyone who believes in something different than them) I have no patience for people like this. These are the people who tell everyone what terrible, terrible people atheists are, when really, the majority of us are very friendly and accepting. I have no problem with people being religious in any way, but it should be kept to the individual, not force-fed to the masses and completely ostracizing anyone who dares question it.
#12
Posted 27 October 2009 - 01:15 PM
#13
Posted 27 October 2009 - 01:25 PM
Anyway God has always been in Billy Corgan lyrics, I mean Machina is all about God.
So nothing have change for me...Billy Corgan lyrics are still the best
As long as God in his lyrics don't become a religious thing it's alright for me and it's haven't been this way so far.
#15
Posted 27 October 2009 - 03:22 PM
Billy's spiritual crusade is very interesting and I hope he is still going this way
Anyway God has always been in Billy Corgan lyrics, I mean Machina is all about God.
So nothing have change for me...Billy Corgan lyrics are still the best
As long as God in his lyrics don't become a religious thing it's alright for me and it's haven't been this way so far.
yes im sure most sp fans have spoke of the meanings of machina, but it wasn't pushed in your face... it was there if you wanted to read into it
i think billy still has great songs in him, and i hope he doesn't limit himself to one specific subject matter (i.e. reigion)
#16
Posted 27 October 2009 - 03:32 PM
#17
Posted 27 October 2009 - 04:12 PM
am i the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about billy's 'spiritual' crusade???
i am excited about the new album, and the only way i can see myself not liking it is if the lyrics are too preachy...
sure the 'i agree with everything billy says' fanclub will prob have a dig at me but im just curious as to whether anyone else feels the same as me?
you're not the only one..I'm with you
But people can't stand non-spirituality here...noone 's gonna understand us...
It is possible to be an athiest and spiritual at the same time.
Generally, Spiritual Atheists are people who do not believe in a literal "God" (thus the term "Atheist"), but still consider themselves to be (often deeply) "Spiritual" people.
For Spiritual Atheists, being "Spiritual" means (at the very least) to nurture thoughts, words, and actions that are in harmony with the idea that the entire universe is, in some way, connected; even if only by the mysterious flow of cause and effect at every scale.
Therefore, Spiritual Atheists generally feel that as they go about their lives striving to be personally healthy and happy, they should also be striving to help the world around them be healthy and happy. (This empowering concept is referred to as "Wholistic Ethics".)
Spiritual Atheists generally recognize the word "God" as a personal name that has been given to the collective personality* of the infinite and eternal universe; just as your personal name is the name that has been given to your individual personality*. Even so, many Spiritual Atheists are extremely reluctant to make use of the word "God"
This is quoted from the spiritual athiest website. This seems to fall in line with what BC talks about. He doens't care who you worship, just love and be a positive light on the world.
oh the first message I read that seems to explain well and in details this poitn of view..thanx for explaining us !
#18
Posted 27 October 2009 - 04:34 PM
Billy's spiritual crusade is very interesting and I hope he is still going this way
Anyway God has always been in Billy Corgan lyrics, I mean Machina is all about God.
So nothing have change for me...Billy Corgan lyrics are still the best
As long as God in his lyrics don't become a religious thing it's alright for me and it's haven't been this way so far.
Yep, God has been in the lyrics...
see?
He even spoke : P Well, okay, Jesus... But he's a God to some, and the son of God!
(Hey, I'm just joking, so don't take too much offense, I don't want to get caught up in a religion debate.)
#21
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:33 PM
#22
Posted 28 October 2009 - 06:14 AM
Yeah, there is that one, but I figured I wanted to go more with a joke than a serious one, y'know? I don't want to bicker over something like Religion. But there is a lot of songs that are anti-christian from their earlier days.
But then the people that go on about "The Pumpkins have been a religious band since MCIS!" I present this.
So yeah.
All good songs, in my eyes haha...
#23
Posted 28 October 2009 - 07:05 AM
#24
Posted 28 October 2009 - 11:13 AM
First of all, let's respect the views of everyone. Second, I think TBK will have it's fair share of preaching (Not my cup of tea either, but never a problem for me to listen to), but no more so that Zeitgeist. In addition, I have a feeling TBK will also take a stroll through the lyrical style of the SP of old.
Ah, but in a way, don't all musicians "preach"? The purpose of lyrics, at least deeply felt ones, is to convey a message to be shared with others. Otherwise, musicians wouldn't give their art to the world at all. In 1995, Billy was "preaching" about the world being a vampire. Give a person a public forum, a pulpit if you will, and they will say things they believe in. At least with Billy, though, he's said he's never cared to convert others to his way of thinking. He values all walks of life that listen to his music.
I stay away from EFHTT because it's of no interest to me, but it doesn't bother me. (So I'm not disagreeing with you there.) But as an atheist who nonetheless believes in morality and love for all, I can certainly appreciate such sentiment. Again, not to regurgitate my former arguments, but the same holds true for me and some religious artists. Just because I don't believe in the "god" or the specific "light" acts such as Matisyahu or Flyleaf sing about, I can interpret their words as a universal goodness.
#26
Posted 28 October 2009 - 02:35 PM
Even Jesus I/Mary star/God's gonna set this world on fire didnt bother me much.
I'm an agnostic but I usually don't mind a little God talk.. It really depends.
Anyway the Spirits in the Sky songs are great.. No worries lyrically.
#27
Posted 28 October 2009 - 04:01 PM
I didn't think the SITS stuff was too preachy at all, though, so if it doesn't get any worse than that I think those of us sensitive to religious melodrama will be just fine. I hope.
#29
Posted 28 October 2009 - 10:41 PM
That being said, I can only appreciate religious or spiritual lyrics on a metaphorical, universal level. The second the lyrics become dogmatic, or far more specific, I am bound to lose interest.
#30
Posted 29 October 2009 - 02:29 AM
Whats worse Bob Dylan releasing a christmas album or Billy puttin lil religious/spiritual references in his songs?
Answer:
it both rocks
#31
Posted 29 October 2009 - 09:07 PM
From Billy's Twitter:
"Further lyrical appropriation: wanna whole lotta love,a whole lotta love! Way down inside, you need Goooddddddddddd!!"
LOL
#33
Posted 30 October 2009 - 05:42 AM
#38
Posted 30 October 2009 - 12:54 PM
Not really. I mean, I know singing about "God" doesn't necessarily mean singing about anything religious, but with Corgan's recent posts/tweets/whole websites... Ugh.
The point is, you can sing about God and not be religious. You asked how singing about God would NOT be religious. Duh. Religion is the organized setting of worshipping God. Many people believe in God and have no religion.
#40
Posted 01 November 2009 - 03:55 AM
duh duh duhhhhhh! (oh noes!)
#43
Posted 01 November 2009 - 07:59 PM

Help































